064 cylinder comparison

[Deets066]

Finally got it loaded

So......... Which one is which?

 

[Deets066]

66 first ?

 

[drf256]

Both saws have great rpm in the crust J.

 

[Miller Mod Saws]

66 first ?

064 first. 064 has a 3/4 wrap!

 

[smokey7]

I was wondering which was which as my stihl eyes are not tuned in. They both ran dam near the same. What is the actual cc size of each? I really don't know much bout stihls.. great job man be proud

 

[Time's Standing Stihl]

Man that's a close race! Well done Jason

Sent from my SM-G900R4 using Tapatalk

 

[Miller Mod Saws]

I was wondering which was which as my stihl eyes are not tuned in. They both ran dam near the same. What is the actual cc size of each? I really don't know much bout stihls.. great job man be proud

064-85cc. 066-92cc. The 064 according to spec sheet is 1.3 lbs lighter IIRC.

 

[Miller Mod Saws]

I believe what jason is trying to show here is the 064 is a real runner stock. And he takes a mild approach compared to some saws to make a tremendous runner out of them. That and 066s are a dime a dozen. Why not own the odd ball from the pack. Lol. Correct me if I'm wrong buddy!

 

[Brewz]

OK.
Looking at Husky 281 piston specs, it is the same length but 1mm less compression height.
So by cutting the base you bring the squish back to spec and effectively lower the intake without having to grind the *s-word out of it.

It leaves the exhaust the same but lowers the intake.

Could I achieve the same result by trimming 1mm off the intake side of the piston skirt or are there other advantages to the husky piston other than the single ring?

 

[jmssaws]

It let's you lower the cylinder without changing timing and the skirts are wide.
No other piston will let you go 70% port width.

 

[jmssaws]

I believe what jason is trying to show here is the 064 is a real runner stock. And he takes a mild approach compared to some saws to make a tremendous runner out of them. That and 066s are a dime a dozen. Why not own the odd ball from the pack. Lol. Correct me if I'm wrong buddy!

A good 066 is pretty rare maybe more so than a 064,I like the 85cccylinder but you can make it 92cc very easy so it's versatile.

 

[jmssaws]

064-85cc. 066-92cc. The 064 according to spec sheet is 1.3 lbs lighter IIRC.

I'll find out what the weight difference is in a few,I do know my wrap 064/066 weighs a couple ounces more than a ms460 and that's why my 046 and 460 have not been used in years.

 

[jmssaws]

Keep in mind that the 064 has a stock chamber and is 7cc smaller,also the 066 isn't run of the mill by any means,064 wins that race against your average 066.

 

[Brewz]

I found the 064 to be lighter than my 066.
I haven't weighed them but it is in between the 066 and a 372 husky

 

[Brewz]

The flywheel is a lot lighter

 

[Brewz]

http://caseywise.com/?p=3790

1.1 lbs or about 600g for those of us advanced enough to use the metric system

 

[jmssaws]

I'll weigh them in a minute

 

[Simondo]

http://caseywise.com/?p=3790

1.1 lbs or about 600g for those of us advanced enough to use the metric system

I must be well advanced....I have to use both !!

 

[jmssaws]

Wtf is the metric system?

 

[Brewz]

Wtf is the metric system?

haha... how many fingers and toes you got?