Obviously STIHL uses the MS 362 to test their new piston not risking a lot of development costs, if any issues may occur.
But what does that mean?
The specs right now may not seem very impressive with respect to MS 362/462.
But... if that very piston will last in the woods of the world, you will sooner or later see new saws developed from scratch according to a piston, that does not need a massive flywheel/crank shaft. Hence the housing will be smaller compared to common saws.
Back to topic.
What benefits does the MS 400 gain with a magnesium piston (compared to a common piston and same displacement)?
For sure the fuel consumption will be reduced , since there is less mass to be moved. The acceleration will be increased.
And there will be slightly more torque from beneath.