No replacement for displacement!

[av8or3]

I have a huge chestnut oak laying in my yard the had to be felled due to rot at the roots. 30” at the base. I’ve been cutting it up this last month with my 500i and a 28” bar. I got down the late production 066 I have and took it for a spin this weekend and was very surprised by how well it performed. I took the bar and chain off the 500i and put it on the 066. The 066 was noticeably stronger and faster than the 500i. And because it was heavier I didn’t have to work as hard holding on. Very pleasant surprise.

 

[59billy]

I've reached the age and decreptitude where I usually pick the lightest saw that will do the job.

But sometimes, I face a tree that requires that I sigh heavily, drag out the 660 and fire it up. No matter how long it sits, it fires right up and I cut what I need to. And I'm always smiling when I return it to the shelf.

 

[Shane¹]

I have a huge chestnut oak laying in my yard the had to be felled due to rot at the roots. 30” at the base. I’ve been cutting it up this last month with my 500i and a 28” bar. I got down the late production 066 I have and took it for a spin this weekend and was very surprised by how well it performed. I took the bar and chain off the 500i and put it on the 066. The 066 was noticeably stronger and faster than the 500i. And because it was heavier I didn’t have to work as hard holding on. Very pleasant surprise.

Where is the 166 if you are going for displacement lol

 

[av8or3]

Where is the 166 if you are going for displacement lol

It’s on the shelf. I’m saving it. I really wanted to run the Stihl. It’s been several years since I have run it and I wanted to run it next to the 500i for a comparison.

 

[Yukon Stihl]

Where is the 166 if you are going for displacement lol

PM 390/Skil 1690

 

[Wilhelm]

^cc = ^torque = ^fun

 

[IffykidMn]

I've reached the age and decreptitude where I usually pick the lightest saw that will do the job.

But sometimes, I face a tree that requires that I sigh heavily, drag out the 660 and fire it up. No matter how long it sits, it fires right up and I cut what I need to. And I'm always smiling when I return it to the shelf.

At 66 I begrudgingly pull out the 088 with 42" bar about once twice a year for something exceptionally large and like you happily put it back on the shelf, even my 592XP is getting used less and less and I am looking forward to the 500i getting back from port work if everything works the way I am hoping the 500i may well replace my 572s as well as the 592s.

 

[edisto]

After Helene, the tree guys left us with this:



Which made me very glad that I had this:

 

[blades]

at 74 my go to units are still the 64xx and 79xx Domars, when the big nasties show up then it is my 084 with either a 42" or 60" bar. ( and yep that is a heavy assembly, but all you do set it up there and pull the trigger)

 

[Sloughfoot]

^cc = ^torque = ^fun

The math checks out.

 

[IffykidMn]

After Helene, the tree guys left us with this:

View attachment 475248

Which made me very glad that I had this:

View attachment 475249

I seldom bother with the 088 unless it is over 4 foot on the stump, for the most part 24" usually gets most things done.

 

[Bill G]

Did someone say displacement.............

 

[Outback]

I agree. I like ported saws not so much for the speed anymore but so I can cut with a longer bar on a smaller lighter saw.

 

[edisto]

I seldom bother with the 088 unless it is over 4 foot on the stump, for the most part 24" usually gets most things done.

Hard to switch sides when you're sitting on one of them, and the other is 15 feet off of the ground.

I didn't need all 43", but I did need most of it.

 

[Motorka]

^cc = ^torque = ^fun

that what she said