What???????????????????
Pitfalls galore with this idea. Genks is right about feeding the guys ego. And it smacks as groveling to me.
And why do we, as a group, need to kiss his butt and set him up as some kind of grand arbiter to gain his seal of approval that we are really a bunch of decent guys? That we aren't as bad as the all the ignorant IH followers have painted us? He's already lined himself up with IH, despite some clear evidence that there is something very wrong with IH's business practices, not to mention his integrity. If ole BBR can't see this then how does building him a saw open his eyes? And why do we care what he thinks?
Little distinction here to keep in mind: We rightfully called out IH for what he did. And in doing so, it can be said that we did "attack" him. But JUST him, and only him. We were then in turn ALL attacked, en masse, by the strange bunch of groupies for which watching ole Harvey's videos is the highlight of their day. Most of them with their eyes, and minds, as closed as BBR's.
What everyone thinks, feels, says, and determines to be right or wrong about this whole matter should be based on the facts involved. An offering at the alter of one of these internet egos to gain favor demeans us. And it doesn't change the facts.
Guess I'm not too in favor of this idea, huh? LOL