High Quality Chainsaw Bars Husqvarna Toys Hockfire Saws

Husky 288/395 Hybrid Build

ZukiRyder440

Breaker of recoils
Local time
9:28 PM
User ID
5876
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
4,452
Location
NY
Country flag
I know what some of ya are probably thinking. It would be easier to just bore out the existing cylinder to 56mm and re plate it.
BUT, I like doing things the hard way. There is a spare 394 top end down in my barn I can get measurements off of.
 

ZukiRyder440

Breaker of recoils
Local time
9:28 PM
User ID
5876
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
4,452
Location
NY
Country flag
There are a few obstacle that I am gonna have to figure out how to get around like how im gonna drop the cylinder enough to clear the top cover, getting the cylinder extension to fit in the smaller hole in the crank cases, etc. I might mock everything up after I get home from practice. Stand by
 

ZukiRyder440

Breaker of recoils
Local time
9:28 PM
User ID
5876
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
4,452
Location
NY
Country flag
To make the 395 cylinder extension fit in the cases I have 3 options:

1: get rid of the extension completely

2: Grind the cases to the desired diameter (would be VERY time consuming for trying to get the cylinder squared to the crank)

3: Put the cylinder up on the lathe and take .015” off the skirt extension thickness.
 

srcarr52

Shop rat, backyard slice cutter.
GoldMember
Local time
9:28 PM
User ID
522
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
4,066
Reaction score
26,710
Location
Iowa City
Country flag
You're forgetting the cylinder/case parting line difference. The skirt extension of the 288 is much longer than the 395 because the distance from the squish band to the gasket surface is shorter on the 288 than the 395. It's more than you can cut off the 395 cylinder so you'll have to cut the gasket surface down on the 288 case.
 

Intoxsawcated

Super OPE Member
Local time
6:28 PM
User ID
5643
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Messages
260
Reaction score
768
Location
ohadinrehtron
Country flag
Last I looked into it I didn't think there was enough material to be removed for it to have enough strength to hold together. I was thinking of having a long rod installed along with dropping the cylinder.

Sent from my SM-S767VL using Tapatalk
 

ZukiRyder440

Breaker of recoils
Local time
9:28 PM
User ID
5876
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
4,452
Location
NY
Country flag
You're forgetting the cylinder/case parting line difference. The skirt extension of the 288 is much longer than the 395 because the distance from the squish band to the gasket surface is shorter on the 288 than the 395. It's more than you can cut off the 395 cylinder so you'll have to cut the gasket surface down on the 288 case.
Yup. I forgot. Ill do more looking and measuring when I get home. Thats something I definitely didn’t have in mind.
 

ZukiRyder440

Breaker of recoils
Local time
9:28 PM
User ID
5876
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
4,452
Location
NY
Country flag
Last I looked into it I didn't think there was enough material to be removed for it to have enough strength to hold together. I was thinking of having a long rod installed along with dropping the cylinder.

Sent from my SM-S767VL using Tapatalk
Are you talking about a 2100 crank? The 288 and 394/395 have the same crank IIRC. Does the 395 have a con rod or am I completely mis enterpretating
your question?
 

Intoxsawcated

Super OPE Member
Local time
6:28 PM
User ID
5643
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Messages
260
Reaction score
768
Location
ohadinrehtron
Country flag
They do have the same crank. The 288 has a taller deck than the 394/5. When I measured mine there was a considerable height difference. 5-7mm if I remember right. It's been awhile though.

Sent from my SM-S767VL using Tapatalk
 

ZukiRyder440

Breaker of recoils
Local time
9:28 PM
User ID
5876
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
4,452
Location
NY
Country flag
They do have the same crank. The 288 has a taller deck than the 394/5. When I measured mine there was a considerable height difference. 5-7mm if I remember right. It's been awhile though.

Sent from my SM-S767VL using Tapatalk
Gotcha. Thank you. Base height on the 395 must have been lower because of the taller cylinder.
 

srcarr52

Shop rat, backyard slice cutter.
GoldMember
Local time
9:28 PM
User ID
522
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
4,066
Reaction score
26,710
Location
Iowa City
Country flag
Gotcha. Thank you. Base height on the 395 must have been lower because of the taller cylinder.

Yes, the 395 has a shorter case deck height with the difference being on the cylinder side since they are the same stroke.

The 2100 has a 2mm larger stroke, 1mm higher at TDC (0.039"), and the rod is 2.835" instead of 2.766". So it would need the cylinder spaced up around 0.108". That might make up the some of the difference in the deck height... just food for thought.
 

ZukiRyder440

Breaker of recoils
Local time
9:28 PM
User ID
5876
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
4,452
Location
NY
Country flag
What I was thinking was have someone with a CNC mill take the .100 or so thous. (not sure on exact measurements, I will do some measuring tonight) off the cases and maybe build up some material with a tig welder just in case the base isn't thick enough. I like what you said previously though Shaun.
 
Top