High Quality Chainsaw Bars Husqvarna Toys Hockfire Saws

Dolmar 64xx/73xx/79xx series, smurfs and solo 665/675/681 thread

old_sir_henry

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
12:53 AM
User ID
7826
Joined
Nov 9, 2018
Messages
881
Reaction score
3,744
Location
Germany in the vicinity of Dolmar City
Country flag
Hi,

I'm fishing for opinions.
I have a 7900 waiting for repair for about 2 years now
which has a broken crankshaft, its clutch-thread is sheared off.
The saw has a brand new 85cc top-end but with a broken crank
its of no good use. That is the state the waw is in since I bought it
as the previous owner had given up on it after the crank died away.

Since then I have been looking for a used crank in fleebay or a complete
saw to donate a crank. Last week, a PS-630 was sold for just 160 EUR and
only 12 km away from the place where I live, but I missed that one by a
few minutes (I learned that since I know the guy who actually bought the saw
and I fetched it for him from the seller).

One possibility would be to buy a new crankshaft which is about
180 EUR, maybe about 160 with discount from my Dolmar dealer.
Another option would be a SOLO 681 crank, which is new available
for about 90 EUR and it even gives a longer stroke.
However: Can that SOLO crank be installed without modifying it on
a lathe? I don't have a lathe.
I have read a thread (don't remeber if it was here or in the other forum)
where someone combined the stock top-end with the SOLO crank and I
understood some grinding in the crankcase will be neccessary in order
to make room for the larger stroke. But then I seem to remember there
had been modifications made on the clutch end of the shaft but I somehow
missed the reason for it.
What do you think: Is the SOLO crank a way to go?
Will it make sense in combination with a 85 cc top-end or is the carb
totally undersized for this combination, we will end up with 87 cc?
Is the crank replacement doable for someone not having a lathe?
Opinions welcome!
 

sawfun

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
3:53 PM
User ID
1076
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
1,183
Reaction score
3,784
Location
Portland Oregon
Country flag
BTW, the Dolmar 7900 is the main reason I started the chainsaw weight gallery. One day @sawfun and I were chillin in Yamhill, Oregon, sat in front of a fat Douglas Fir log with a 372, an 046, a 7900, and his old 044. We were about to test them side by side(and we were both impressed by all of them). I then said to him, no freakin way that 7900 weighs a pound less than my 046. They felt nearly identical in weight. But everyone on the AS forums was saying it weighed 13.6 lbs. I shut them up about that in short order.

https://pbase.com/wyk/unofficial_chainsaw_weight_gallery

137564856.tFBIhj7g.046MagScale.jpg

137564899.xShNz9sU.7900.JPG

139197486.wjuUlOdd.jpg
That day spawns fond memories for me. I have since sold that 7900 as I had ran it side by side with a strong running stock ms460 and found that I liked the Stihl better, with the exception of the AV. I now have a stock early 046 that cut circles around that 460 and would have done so to the 7900 as well. As far as weight goes, When I weighed that 7900, it weighed the exact same as my 460, 14.6 lbs empty, both with dual dogs and half wrap. Maybe Dolmar removed the dogs and clutch cover to get the 13.9 weight? I dunno, but mine wasn't at that number. I believe the 7900 balances just slightly better than the Stihl. We had an early 064 out to if memory serves, and with a 32" bar it was stronger than the 7900 with 28" bar. I've now found I prefer my 372's, though ported, to either the 7900 or 046. The Husky balances and oils much better than either of the other two saws, especially with a 36" bar. And while I haven't ever needed them, I carry the extra muffler bolts I've been warned to, as the penalty for running the seemingly dreaded Husky. lol
 

dustinwilt68

Wilt Built Work Saws
Local time
6:53 PM
User ID
1007
Joined
Mar 8, 2016
Messages
5,933
Reaction score
26,230
Location
Southwest PA
Country flag
If I remember correctly he just used the a sander and smoothed the casting mark on the crank itself, should be doable
 

Fruecrue

certified hand catcher
Local time
6:53 PM
User ID
2417
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
4,391
Reaction score
21,692
Location
Alden NY
Country flag

brox

Well-Known OPE Member
Local time
3:53 PM
User ID
4658
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
42
Reaction score
125
Location
PNW
Country flag
That guys a total hack.
Cases definitely require clearance work, shim out the oil pump, space up the cylinder and or cut the squish and you’re good to go.

Ha ha, I'm still too big of a chicken to try it.
 

mettee

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
4:53 PM
User ID
5872
Joined
Apr 10, 2018
Messages
1,425
Reaction score
5,404
Location
Arizona
Country flag
Hi,

I'm fishing for opinions.
I have a 7900 waiting for repair for about 2 years now
which has a broken crankshaft, its clutch-thread is sheared off.
The saw has a brand new 85cc top-end but with a broken crank
its of no good use. That is the state the waw is in since I bought it
as the previous owner had given up on it after the crank died away.

Since then I have been looking for a used crank in fleebay or a complete
saw to donate a crank. Last week, a PS-630 was sold for just 160 EUR and
only 12 km away from the place where I live, but I missed that one by a
few minutes (I learned that since I know the guy who actually bought the saw
and I fetched it for him from the seller).

One possibility would be to buy a new crankshaft which is about
180 EUR, maybe about 160 with discount from my Dolmar dealer.
Another option would be a SOLO 681 crank, which is new available
for about 90 EUR and it even gives a longer stroke.
However: Can that SOLO crank be installed without modifying it on
a lathe? I don't have a lathe.
I have read a thread (don't remeber if it was here or in the other forum)
where someone combined the stock top-end with the SOLO crank and I
understood some grinding in the crankcase will be neccessary in order
to make room for the larger stroke. But then I seem to remember there
had been modifications made on the clutch end of the shaft but I somehow
missed the reason for it.
What do you think: Is the SOLO crank a way to go?
Will it make sense in combination with a 85 cc top-end or is the carb
totally undersized for this combination, we will end up with 87 cc?
Is the crank replacement doable for someone not having a lathe?
Opinions welcome!


I think the combo with solo crank would be cool to see.

As far as the carb, just modify it using the poleman tutorial. It's tough to get the jet out but I just drill them out and replace with a scavenged one.
 

brox

Well-Known OPE Member
Local time
3:53 PM
User ID
4658
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
42
Reaction score
125
Location
PNW
Country flag
Nah, what do you have to lose?
It needs to come apart anyway.
Take it apart, think about it...

Still need a case splitter, do the normal Husky style work? That's what I was leaning towards since I mostly own Husky.
 

mettee

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
4:53 PM
User ID
5872
Joined
Apr 10, 2018
Messages
1,425
Reaction score
5,404
Location
Arizona
Country flag
Still need a case splitter, do the normal Husky style work? That's what I was leaning towards since I mostly own Husky.


Yes the husky splitter works perfect. I think it took me a couple minutes to split a case. Bearing were a little tough to remove, but that's good you don't want them loose in the case.
 

Wilhelm

I'm here for the sick'n twisted company
Yearly GoldMember
Local time
12:53 AM
User ID
1204
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
13,381
Reaction score
52,172
Location
Croatia
Country flag
The saw weight comments and comparisons are worse than arguments what oil to use at what ratio.

Just so You know I have no clue how much xx lbs is and I had to look it up on Google.
For example:
13.6lbs = 6.17kg
14.6lbs = 6.62kg
To me in lbs the difference looks and sounds huge, shown in kg the difference is at 0.45kg barely worth mentioning.

If You can feel the weight difference of under 1/2kg than You must be able to feel the need to refuel Your saws tanks BEFORE the engine or chain tell You so, considering that fuel & oil tank carry over 1kg of fluids combined (Dolmar PS-7900, 0.75 + 0.42 liter).

Some of You guys must be really sensitive.
No bad thoughts nor toe stepping intended, I am just making a post as have You.
 
Top