I had to make a new post coz even I got confused which was which. So the photos go:
A7s with super sharp Nikon wide angle lens - 12mpxl full frame sensor. About a $3000 combination.
Then:
Canon M3 and it's surprisingly sharp 15mm-35mm zoom lens - 24 mpxl sensor. $300 or so for both, and my main rig for walking about. I prefer Canon colors nowadays to all others as well. Unless you photoshop it, it is difficult to mimic them in other cameras.
Sony A7(non 's') standard full frame and 28-70mm Sony lens - 24mpxl sensor. Told you guys I tend to shoot thru windows. A $2k camera when it came out. I got it as a christmas gift 2 years after it debuted. So it prolly cost my cousin 1200 bucks or so at the time.
The second photo of the country market is the Canon M3.
Then a curve ball -
A Sony NEX6 from 2011. Super sharp 50mm adapted Canon prime lens, tho - 16mpxl sensor. A 190$ combination since it is a manual lens from the 70's and cost me like 40 bucks.
Same Sony NEX6 for the signs, but with a super cheap wide angle Sony kit lens. I did not process the image to look that dreamy, that is how sharp the lens is! So one can use it, its propensity to flare and lose even more contrast, to ones advantage. If you want to do landscape, tho - there's much much better choices.
And this is a knuckle ball. You can tell once you zoom in there's not as much detail or dynamic range as most the other images. But who zooms in to pics other than a print maker? The grave pic is made with a 2003 model Nikon D2h, which was outdated even at the time I took this image in 2007. It was $4000 when it came out and is wearing a $1000 lens. It has a 4 mega pixel sensor. I got both the cam and the lens used at the time for $750. Though the body was heavy, it did have a huge amount of easy to use controls, could take 8 photos per second with full AF tracking, had ridiculously fast flash syncing for the time, and one could easily bludgeon a walrus to death with it and then take photos of the aftermath due to it's robustness.
