SELLING NEW HUSQ 372XP NON XTORQ

[Bill G]

pm sent

.......never saw it

 

[chipper1]

I prefer to pass the good deals on to others.

It's story time with Bill .

 

[Bill G]

It's story time with Bill .

Nah

 

[Rainsford]

Bump!

 

[J.Noss]

Quick question about these non X-torq 372 motors: does that mean that they are NOT what's considered a strato-engine? The X-torq is I believe strato-carb fresh air injection.. right? Trying to understand the difference

 

[jacktheripper]

Quick question about these non X-torq 372 motors: does that mean that they are NOT what's considered a strato-engine? The X-torq is I believe strato-carb fresh air injection.. right? Trying to understand the difference

Standard old school two stroke engine. The old 372 top end was known to be faster and a tad stronger.

 

[sawmikaze]

Standard old school two stroke engine. The old 372 top end was known to be faster and a tad stronger.

I've never ran a 372 OE that had as much torque as an X-torq with long bars.

And I lost count of how many I've ran, even in the red versions.

But..I think the OE is better for longevity and it's more zippy with a 20-24" bar.

 

[jacktheripper]

I've never ran a 372 OE that had as much torque as an X-torq with long bars.

And I lost count of how many I've ran, even in the red versions.

But..I think the OE is better for longevity and it's more zippy with a 20-24" bar.

Ya but the OE smells better

 

[sawmikaze]

Ya but the OE smells better

Depends on the bar.

 

[J.Noss]

Standard old school two stroke engine. The old 372 top end was known to be faster and a tad stronger.

Oh cool that'd probably give more potential for portwork and expansion chamber pipe if one was so inclined

Ya but the OE smells better

I've heard that the non X-torq saw engines have more potential once ported or piped, makes sense they could to me