Anyone recognize this port work?

[Int1968]

It’s a 346

 

[jacob j.]

I don't recognize the port work but that seems like a lot of Dirko...

 

[hacskaroly]

I don't recognize the port work but that seems like a lot of Dirko...

But Dirko is like JB Weld, you can't have too much...

 

[Woodpecker]

It’s a 346
View attachment 446396View attachment 446397

View attachment 446398

Where did you buy the saw?

 

[Int1968]

Off a member on here two years ago, last year? Was the last version of the 346

 

[Woodpecker]

Off a member on here two years ago, last year? Was the last version of the 346

Pm the member you bought it from. They should know who ported it.

 

[Jusgunn3]

Did it run good?

 

[huskihl]

I’d love to see it run. It might straight up kick ass

 

[drf256]

Sloppy with poor finish, but pretty symmetrical.

I personally don’t see the need for the wacky bridge ports with the widened secondaries.

 

[MG porting]

I was thinking the same and it must be a single ring piston I don't see any other way around that with them big bridge ports.

 

[Bjorn]

I would call it finger ports

 

[Woodpecker]

@Int1968 what exactly is the point of this thread? And why shouldn’t I delete it before it devolves into a witch hunt?

 

[EFSM]

That may not be the shiniest finish, but that doesn't matter. It looks like quite symmetrical grinding.

 

[Woodwackr]

So, I he question, still is…how does it perform?
I picked up a 262 that looked like it had been butchered, porting wise, but it runs great. Go figure.
In comparison to mine, that work looks top drawer.