Recent content by wcorey

IIRC it's a little convoluted. It started over on AS just a bit before this site started, then switched over to here but the majority of it was in a long running multi person PM. Was also right around the time discussions in the community about porting were getting less secretive, freeing up...

I've been just sort of sticking my toe in the water in using AI to come up with software for it, I'm clueless there but it seems promising. The demise of that project really took the wind out 'o my sails where saws are concerned, was so close to being... something... Haven't given up though...

Ain't gettin younger, that's for sure, starting to feel it after a hard days work. No cause to complain though, when I compare with others I'm around, relatively speaking. Been having a hard time staying interested in the saws I've accumulated to waist deep, this place helps keep me going in...

From the saw weight thread... 562 would be 3.5% heavier. Nikko said something like he owned the 361 because it was the Husqvarna of Stihls. Of course that's all flipped around with the newer models now...

Sometimes they do it to to able to call it 'parts' for customs reasons...

Oh no, popup wars...!

6.5cr is kinda known for primer flowback, used in ar platforms it's recommended to use a 'high pressure bolt', meaning it has a smaller firing pin/hole and sometimes dual extractors. Magnum primers also help.

Typically open port cylinders are bottom fed and don't need a windowed piston but the 42 is side fed open port so it would seem that it would benefit from the windows.

I believe those flags with the triple cross bars were intended to go with the full wrap.

That's a honkin' huge 4 jaw for a lathe that size, lol. Be extra careful of fingers and whatnot down by the ways especially when the jaws are extended out past flush...

Picture got cut off, near the bottom shows part # for a 133 piston which should be the same as a 234. The stated spec of 12mm from pin to top seems suspect...

Looked like you were replying to the post just previous to yours with the $300 wheel.

$300, not 300 grit…

I think you're misunderstanding the term ‘multiple axis’ grind. The wheel profile there is likely only a small part of the picture. Your grinder only goes in to the cutter and back out on one axis/plane, so the radius is dictated by the wheel profile. With use of multiple axis, a production...

Doesn't say what grit size it is...