High Quality Chainsaw Bars Husqvarna Toys

288XP vs PS7900

Derf

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
12:24 AM
User ID
526
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
736
Reaction score
2,643
Location
Long Island NY
Country flag
These two saws are from different times, but have similar displacement and cult-like followings.

Which would you rather have / use, a Husqvarna 288XP (low or high top, regular or lite, doesn’t matter), or a Dolmar PS 7900 (or 7910)? And why?

Discuss.
 

huskyboy

Sorta a husqvarna guy...
Local time
12:24 AM
User ID
1352
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
10,025
Reaction score
43,452
Location
Ct
Country flag
I prefer the 7900/7910 chassis saws for the kind of work I do with a 20/24/28” bar (mostly medium size hardwood logging or firewood). It’s smoother and much more refined overall. However with a long bar say a 32” full comp in hardwood, the 288 is no question a better chassis to hold up to that kind of strain/abuse... it’s a larger saw with more torque. Really comes down to what your gonna use it for. Imo the 7900 is more comparable to a ms460 than a older 90cc saw like a 288 imo.
 
Last edited:

CR888

Here For The Long Haul!
Local time
2:24 PM
User ID
452
Joined
Jan 9, 2016
Messages
2,622
Reaction score
10,581
Location
Australia
Country flag
Id rather start up a 288 set it down & listen to it idling then pick up a 7900 & buck up some nice 20"+ wood. 79-series for day to day work as there current easily replaceable with new parts availability, 288xp for play and to sit proud in your collection.
 

foeke

Well-Known OPE Member
Local time
12:24 AM
User ID
2128
Joined
Nov 16, 2016
Messages
70
Reaction score
184
Location
NL
I'm in the 7910 camp.
288 xp has an extra kilo I can't carry a day.
The 390 XP I would like a tad more. But still to heavy for my 70 kg keyboard warrior body.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G955F met Tapatalk
 

XP_Slinger

They’re Just Saws
Local time
12:24 AM
User ID
845
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
6,089
Reaction score
27,523
Location
Central NY
Country flag
Since I don’t have a 7900/10...288 FTW! Lol.

In all seriousness I’ve never run a 7900, hope to someday. But, I’m one of those weirdos that likes solid rubber mounts and lower rpm old school torque. Currently my ported 372XPW sits on the shelf for felling duty, not saying it’s a 7900 but it is comparable in size. For a day cutting firewood on a log pile my 288 sits and the 372 comes out. I imagine it might be the same if I had a 7900...but who knows.
 

Marshy

WFO Cutting
Local time
12:24 AM
User ID
417
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
3,800
Reaction score
13,098
Location
Mexico NY
I have a MMWS ported 288 and love the torque. I now own a 7900 play saw that Kevin built and it has a pipe. The extra weigh the 288 has is very noticable even though the 7900 has a pipe. They don't even feel like the same class saw just going on handle weight. I was surprised at the difference between the two. Maybe I should fill them both up with fluids and weight them.

I cant compare the two saws in the cut. Completely different animals.
 

RIDE-RED 350r

Here For The Long Haul!
Local time
12:24 AM
User ID
839
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
3,228
Reaction score
12,760
Location
Blossvale NY
I also have not tried a 7900 but I own a 288 and a 390 and can attest to how the power curve was "moved" between those two. The 288 definitely has more lower RPM grunt and the 390 likes to rev a bit more. After it all shakes out, I think the two are pretty evenly matched in terms of cutting power, they just get it done a bit differently from one another. I could see the 7900 being a bit higher reving than the 288 but not being able to compete in the lower end grunt while being a bit more comfy in the handling department. Love to try one sometime.
 

SOS Ridgerider

Muffler Modded Member
Staff member
GoldMember
Local time
12:24 AM
User ID
1222
Joined
Apr 30, 2016
Messages
2,485
Reaction score
14,766
Location
Central CT
Country flag
Since I don’t have a 7900/10...288 FTW! Lol.

In all seriousness I’ve never run a 7900, hope to someday. But, I’m one of those weirdos that likes solid rubber mounts and lower rpm old school torque. Currently my ported 372XPW sits on the shelf for felling duty, not saying it’s a 7900 but it is comparable in size. For a day cutting firewood on a log pile my 288 sits and the 372 comes out. I imagine it might be the same if I had a 7900...but who knows.
I also have not tried a 7900 but I own a 288 and a 390 and can attest to how the power curve was "moved" between those two. The 288 definitely has more lower RPM grunt and the 390 likes to rev a bit more. After it all shakes out, I think the two are pretty evenly matched in terms of cutting power, they just get it done a bit differently from one another. I could see the 7900 being a bit higher reving than the 288 but not being able to compete in the lower end grunt while being a bit more comfy in the handling department. Love to try one sometime.
I know someone that may have a few 7900/7910 you guys can run...
 

MustangMike

Mastermind Approved!
Local time
12:24 AM
User ID
338
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
11,433
Reaction score
35,921
Location
Brewster, NY
Country flag
I know you did not ask, but since I see one concern over weight, and another preferring rubber AV … CFB Hybrid FTW!!! A very impressive saw for the weight, and with a 28" light bar very hard to beat on a power to weight basis. (My favorite felling saw, as it is light enough for me to reach for those impossible angles that you occasionally need to do (when trees have rot, etc.).
 

huskyboy

Sorta a husqvarna guy...
Local time
12:24 AM
User ID
1352
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
10,025
Reaction score
43,452
Location
Ct
Country flag
I have a friend’s rattler 288 and two hot 7900/7910 here I could compare but I don’t have any worthy test wood at this moment. Here’s the 288 noodling. It runs good.
 
Last edited:

huskyboy

Sorta a husqvarna guy...
Local time
12:24 AM
User ID
1352
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
10,025
Reaction score
43,452
Location
Ct
Country flag
I don't think Fred was considering cookie cutting. He wanted your opinion of said saws for work.
It would take a 32” bar and big timber for me to choose the 288 over the 7900. I simply don’t “need” a 288 for what I do. But I sure want one for the shelf and “occasional” use. Lol
 

MustangMike

Mastermind Approved!
Local time
12:24 AM
User ID
338
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
11,433
Reaction score
35,921
Location
Brewster, NY
Country flag
I agree with you Mason. Regardless of the brand, I only like to use the 90+ cc class saws on large timber (36" bar) or for milling, otherwise I much prefer the smaller / lighter saws, and they will pull a 28" bar just fine.
 
Top