- Local time
- 4:37 AM
- User ID
- 264
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2015
- Messages
- 3,182
- Reaction score
- 7,227
- Location
- The land of pleasant living
Oooppps...thanks Mike!!! Lol .I was in Trauma mode...
Thanks man. That dern 357 has a way of surprising and/or impressing me when I get it out. My MOFO 262 is strong as all hell and I didn’t expect the 357 to be that close to it, .41 seconds in small wood, .78 in full bar cut. I’d wager proper machine work to the 357 would bring it to dead even with the 262. Is speed everything? Of course not, and the 262 still feels like it has more grunt when you abuse it. That thing just eats.
It’s days like this that make me again wonder why there isn’t a bigger fan club for 357’s. Big punch in a small package.
My bad...avatar tricked my eyes.I'm not Custer lol.
Tough to say for sure. My 262 is broken in, I have 15 tanks through it now. A lot will change as yours breaks in...trust me. Sombitch runs STRONG.I dont know, I think my MOFO 262 runs better a little bit fatter for some reason. 13.5 and you can lean hard on it and it wont skip a beat. But then again it aint even broke in. Alot might change. Cleans up in the wood nice too. But that 357 sure did surprise me. Nice little saws they are. I bet you're right about your assumption
I dont know, I think my MOFO 262 runs better a little bit fatter for some reason. 13.5 and you can lean hard on it and it wont skip a beat. But then again it aint even broke in. Alot might change. Cleans up in the wood nice too. But that 357 sure did surprise me. Nice little saws they are. I bet you're right about your assumption
All saws look very good.Here it is fellers. Hope you enjoy it and looking forward to discussing afterward.
Glad you enjoyed it Travis. My 262 is wearing that 55 tank you gave me. Still in your debt for that oneAll saws look very good.
Nice video as well
Thanks
Sent from my SM-J327V using Tapatalk
Al didn’t put fingers in my cylinder, so it’s not maxed out in power potential. Said he built it for torque and boy did he hit a bullseye. Times were very close but the 262 still feels like it’s got more guts than the 357 cutting bigger wood. Which showed in the times with the wider margin in the full bar cut.I really enjoyed this comparison. Thanks so much.
When Al did your 262 did he do full Monty with bridge/fingers or just cut the squish and base and work the intake/exhaust?
The early 262s had a slightly smaller combustion chaber and different transfer ports than later 262s.
Also same is true of the early 254s - smaller combustion chamber. Other things changed too like ignition coils and carbs on those 2-series and that plays into differences in saws too.(And yours has the rarer 87 carb that plays well with a ported saw.)
Also worth noting that in this case the 262 and 357 were ported while the 254 was more stock, but I thought the 254 did well!
Although it's easy to quantify speed, I think the 254 probably weighs the least by a couple grams, the 357 and 262 are probably pretty close in weight, no? The 254 prob had the most vibs with rubber AV, the 262 slightly better with early semi-spring mount and the 357 probably felt best in low vib spring AV.
The 372xpw (75cc) is just in another league. But if you come to the CT GTG this year I hope you'll bring all these saws.
Great vid, the high speed piss-revving cracks me up. Nice running saws u have thereMy pleasure Dub, sorry it took so long lol
Edit: he’s not Custer
Makes you laugh like when you're working on the saws on mommas washing machine .cracks me up
So it was a 20x3/8 in the video?I think it’s a little out of its comfort zone pulling a 20” 3/8 bar
Yes sir 20” 3/8. Regular Oregon round ground, full chisel. Don’t know what the model letters are...not a chain guy lol!So it was a 20x3/8 in the video?
What chain.
Great job on the vid/editing, that's a lot of time/work .
Thank you Sir!Good vid XP...
Thanks CusterGreat vid, the high speed piss-revving cracks me up. Nice running saws u have there
Thanks Bob! How about that 357? Dern thing put up a fight!Good job Josh!