ElevatorGuy
It’s up and down ;)
- Local time
- 8:46 AM
- User ID
- 15250
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2021
- Messages
- 789
- Reaction score
- 2,270
- Location
- Maryland
They’re a damn fine saw with your small dawgs. Stay away from the larger ones. It’s almost impossible to get a 462 to cut with a longer bar and a sharp chain with the R dawgs. Flywheel isn’t heavy enough to carry enough momentum to power through a bog.I have a 28” setup too, Haven’t used that yet.
Extra hot sausages help?They’re a damn fine saw with your small dawgs. Stay away from the larger ones. It’s almost impossible to get a 462 to cut with a longer bar and a sharp chain with the R dawgs. Flywheel isn’t heavy enough to carry enough momentum to power through a bog.
Helps a little bit with the bogging, but they’ll still do it with the long spikesExtra hot sausages help?
I’ll take a set!I just found out (atleast according to the guys I buy from) that those dawgs from an 064 are discontinued.
I'm pissed.
Paging the guys that can make them...
The heavier the flywheel the more stored energy take a very heavy flywheel and a very light flywheel which one would offer the least amount of resistance to slow down.I’m not understanding the bigger Dawgs being worse comments. I generally like the smaller ones myself because they give up less bar and our hardwoods don’t have thick bark.
My own 462 was equipt with 661 Dawgs from the dealer I bought it from, it’s what he had on hand. I didn’t want/need an R model and still don’t see the point in one. I haven’t had any issues, but I’m not a professional cutter either.
So are you saying the longer Dawgs create a shorter lever arm that will apply more torque to the bar and chain? Wouldn’t the user just lift less if they knew what they were doing instead of stalling the saw in the cut?
Also, the age old light vs heavy flywheel argument. Other than initial increased kinetic energy being available when load suddenly applied I don’t see how a heavier flywheel would make any difference during a short increase in bar pressure during a continual load event. I could see a heavier flywheel being better for limbing and for a stable idle, but that’s about it.
I never had a wrapped handle till very recently. I can see them being very handy for felling. There's times I need to be standing on the right side of the back cut. Not an issue when running a shorter bar, but a heavier bar and saw always left me wishing for that extra bit of handle to balance the saw better.I didn’t want/need an R model and still don’t see the point in one.
The problem with dawgs that have the lower spike a lot further below the bar is as soon as the chain hits the wood it pulls the bar down and stalls the chain and it's a pain in the ass trying to dodge that phenomena cut after cut