rumatt
Super OPE Member
There seems to be a lot of love for the wrap handle, particularly on the 461. I'd say I see it recommended 3-1 over the non-R model.
My main hesitation is the weight. It's 1.1 lbs heavier than 461. Before anyone says "one pound is nothing", a few observations.
I ask because I stumbled upon a lightly used, ported 461R. I didn't particularly want the R, but it was a good deal so I grabbed it. But now part of me wants to swap out the R components I don't care about (wrap handle, dogs, large clutch cover...) and just keep the high output oiler. But that seems like a lot of work, so if I really want to be a weight weenie I'll probably just keep it as-is for now and replace it with a 462 when it's available in the US and proves reliable.
My main hesitation is the weight. It's 1.1 lbs heavier than 461. Before anyone says "one pound is nothing", a few observations.
- 1.1 lbs is more than half of the difference between a 461 and a 661. If 1.1 lbs is not a big deal, then why not add 1.1 more and use a 661 for the extra torque?
- People are going bonkers over the upcoming 462. Why? Because it's 1.4 lbs lighter than the 461. It even has less displacement and torque and it's still considered a game changer. Are these the same people adding 1.1 pounds onto their 461?
I ask because I stumbled upon a lightly used, ported 461R. I didn't particularly want the R, but it was a good deal so I grabbed it. But now part of me wants to swap out the R components I don't care about (wrap handle, dogs, large clutch cover...) and just keep the high output oiler. But that seems like a lot of work, so if I really want to be a weight weenie I'll probably just keep it as-is for now and replace it with a 462 when it's available in the US and proves reliable.