High Quality Chainsaw Bars Husqvarna Toys

Stroking a Dolmar 7900

Fruecrue

certified hand catcher
Local time
5:44 AM
User ID
2417
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
4,391
Reaction score
21,689
Location
Alden NY
Country flag
The 'induction stroke' for a two-stroke is from transfer closing to TDC. When you raise the transfer height, you reduce the induction stroke. (you can get the same time/area by widening the transfers without reducing the induction stroke)

It would be interesting to see what a stock 7900 performs like when the crankcase is machined out to give an extra .30" of clearance. The added crankcase volume will reduce the crankcase compression and broadened the powerband.
Gives a guy a lot to think about. My brain wants to trend data. I’m always looking for a relationship of bore to stroke vs. what timing or other characteristics make a certain motor shine. Induction stroke seems relative here, as does blowdown.
I’m still trying to fully understand what makes this saw run best with more blowdown than others.
Not trying to be picky, but that added crankcase volume comes with an added mm of stroke, so saw isn’t exactly stock anymore. I think I’m picking up what you’re putting down though. I’ve been told that tight case helps to make the 7900 what it is.
 

Terry Syd

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
7:44 PM
User ID
575
Joined
Jan 18, 2016
Messages
1,589
Reaction score
5,973
Location
Comboyne, NSW Australia
Country flag
You talkin specific to the 7900 or any saw?

Any saw, the added crankcase volume lowers the maximum delivery ratio (peak torque) in the powerband. That's why chainsaws have a relatively low crankcase compression ratio as they need a broad powerband.

What I was referring to in my post was by reducing the crankcase compression on a stock 7900, could the width of the powerband be increased. In other words, is a felt increase in torque in such a mod more a result of a bigger crankcase volume and less of an increase in stroke.

I don't know the answer, but I do have a strong aversion to raising transfers on two-strokes. Sometimes it is necessary, but a quad-port chainsaw has plenty of room to widen the transfers and still leave good ring support.
 

Deets066

AKA Deetsey
Local time
5:44 AM
User ID
290
Joined
Dec 28, 2015
Messages
15,435
Reaction score
73,475
Location
Illinois
Country flag
Any saw, the added crankcase volume lowers the maximum delivery ratio (peak torque) in the powerband. That's why chainsaws have a relatively low crankcase compression ratio as they need a broad powerband.

What I was referring to in my post was by reducing the crankcase compression on a stock 7900, could the width of the powerband be increased. In other words, is a felt increase in torque in such a mod more a result of a bigger crankcase volume and less of an increase in stroke.

I don't know the answer, but I do have a strong aversion to raising transfers on two-strokes. Sometimes it is necessary, but a quad-port chainsaw has plenty of room to widen the transfers and still leave good ring support.
Why do you hear about crank stuffers and full circle cranks if in fact it should be the other way around?
 

Terry Syd

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
7:44 PM
User ID
575
Joined
Jan 18, 2016
Messages
1,589
Reaction score
5,973
Location
Comboyne, NSW Australia
Country flag
You can push the 'peak delivery ratio' up higher with a higher crankcase compression. So, if you are racing and not worrying about low-end torque, stuffing the crankcase makes a lot of sense.

Chainsaw racers have mentioned that running a full-circle crank to reduce the crankcase volume pushes the powerband up about 400 RPM.

If you are running a small saw (like for limbing) and you want it to produce more top-end power for the same size and weight, you can do the same trick, but with a reduction in low-end torque.
 

mettee

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
2:44 AM
User ID
5872
Joined
Apr 10, 2018
Messages
1,425
Reaction score
5,403
Location
Arizona
Country flag
Here's a better trick for the 7900 - find an old Zama C3M 'twin jet' carb and have Poleman mod it for the saw. The increase in low-end torque with a proper fuel ratio has to be felt to understand.

How can you tell if you have a twin jet Terry?
 

Terry Syd

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
7:44 PM
User ID
575
Joined
Jan 18, 2016
Messages
1,589
Reaction score
5,973
Location
Comboyne, NSW Australia
Country flag
You have to open up the 'wet side' and see if there is a brass jet on each side of the welch plug (thus 'twin jet').

There have been a few threads that have mentioned the carbs and mods on this forum. Several have pictures of the insides.

Poleman used to be able to get Chinese Twin Jets for less than $20 and then mod them, unfortunately that source has dried up. Now you have to scrounge around and find an old Zama C3M.
 

Deets066

AKA Deetsey
Local time
5:44 AM
User ID
290
Joined
Dec 28, 2015
Messages
15,435
Reaction score
73,475
Location
Illinois
Country flag
You can push the 'peak delivery ratio' up higher with a higher crankcase compression. So, if you are racing and not worrying about low-end torque, stuffing the crankcase makes a lot of sense.

Chainsaw racers have mentioned that running a full-circle crank to reduce the crankcase volume pushes the powerband up about 400 RPM.

If you are running a small saw (like for limbing) and you want it to produce more top-end power for the same size and weight, you can do the same trick, but with a reduction in low-end torque.
Every saw I have added case compression to has been a really good runner throughout the power curve. I have not tested it by itself though. Gunna have to try that one of these days
 

hseII

AKA - Karenberly's Husband
Local time
5:44 AM
User ID
311
Joined
Dec 29, 2015
Messages
6,807
Reaction score
24,333
Location
West Georgia
Country flag
What clearance between crank lobes and case are you shooting for Dave?

c4257a2f44d5f53999630b669ba4467a.jpg




Sent from my iPhone using Jon1212 Pro
 
Top