High Quality Chainsaw Bars Husqvarna Toys

Mtronics & Milling

Ron660

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
9:33 AM
User ID
334
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
1,399
Reaction score
3,205
Location
NW Louisiana
Country flag
I've never owned a saw with mtronics but was considering the idea. I have a milling project planned this summer with several large cypress trees (using a 28" bar). When milling, I'm guessing, most will tune their carbs richer than normal. Since an mtronics saw's carb can't be adjusted, would a non-mtronics saw (like an 066 or a 395) be a better choice for milling and noodling?
 

huskyboy

Sorta a husqvarna guy...
Local time
10:33 AM
User ID
1352
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
10,025
Reaction score
43,452
Location
Ct
Country flag
I've never owned a saw with mtronics but was considering the idea. I have a milling project planned this summer with several large cypress trees (using a 28" bar). When milling, I'm guessing, most will tune their carbs richer than normal. Since an mtronics saw's carb can't be adjusted, would a non-mtronics saw (like an 066 or a 395) be a better choice for milling and noodling?
661 I’ve been using recently seems to do fine oiling with a 25” bar and the torque is very good. I’d imagine one would do fine milling with a 28” bar and max flo filter. If I were milling anything larger I’d go 395...better filter setup, oiler, wide powerband and cooler running outboard clutch make for a good milling platform. You can tune it rich for long milling cuts as well. I plan on picking up a chainsaw mill attachment to play around with sometime soon myself.
 
Last edited:

sledneck22

But, is the chain sharp?
GoldMember
Local time
9:33 AM
User ID
16038
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
403
Reaction score
1,556
Location
WI
Country flag
I was wondering if anyone has more time on the mill with an autotune or m-tronic saw (661)? Running the saw fat definitely helps with the longevity of the saw but without being able to tune, how are the 661c's holding up on the mill?
 

sledneck22

But, is the chain sharp?
GoldMember
Local time
9:33 AM
User ID
16038
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
403
Reaction score
1,556
Location
WI
Country flag
Iv done quite a bit of milling with a 661. Used 36 and 41” bars with good results. They have noticeably more torque than my 385 that I have done tons of milling with.

Out of curiosity, what are you running for mix ratio since you can't fatten up the saw? (661c)

Main reason I ask is because I have 462cm that I'm waffling over using to mill some smaller 8-12" pine logs into beams. Be a lighter and quicker than abusing the 2095 for those smaller pine logs.
 

redline4

I'm huge in Japan
Local time
9:33 AM
User ID
5593
Joined
Mar 12, 2018
Messages
11,588
Reaction score
95,070
Location
Rosholt Wisconsin
Country flag
Out of curiosity, what are you running for mix ratio since you can't fatten up the saw? (661c)

Main reason I ask is because I have 462cm that I'm waffling over using to mill some smaller 8-12" pine logs into beams. Be a lighter and quicker than abusing the 2095 for those smaller pine logs.


Your 462 would probably work just fine for that small of pine.
I used a wheezed out old 268xp to "mill" some 18" oak to make planks for a bench I build for my wife.
It wasn't fast, but it didn't blow up and it got the job done.
 

thinair

Super OPE Member
Local time
7:33 AM
User ID
11985
Joined
Mar 13, 2020
Messages
185
Reaction score
573
Location
B.C Canada
Country flag
Out of curiosity, what are you running for mix ratio since you can't fatten up the saw? (661c)

Main reason I ask is because I have 462cm that I'm waffling over using to mill some smaller 8-12" pine logs into beams. Be a lighter and quicker than abusing the 2095 for those smaller pine logs.

36:1 Motul 800
 
Top