husqvarna 439

[jake wells]

Seen this on there website looks neat but 399.00 is to high for 35cc saw.

 

[dall]

where does the paper come from ? lol

 

[jake wells]

where does the paper come from ? lol

the store of course .

 

[dall]

i meant the roll of tp lol

 

[KenJax Tree]

One of the biggest POS saws Husky ever made.

 

[dall]

looks like they are trying to get fancy and appeal to the heterojacks lol

 

[jake wells]

One of the biggest POS saws Husky ever made.

i like these better.

 

[KYsawman]

It looks like a T435 with a rear handle, I think Stihl did some thing like that about ten or so years ago. kind of an in between saw. if it where 70cc then it would be something.

 

[cgraham1]

I'll stick with my 242xp.

 

[KenJax Tree]

I take my post back. I was thinking of the 339xp based off the 338xpt. I know nothing about this one.

 

[Jon1212]

Anyone else think that the spike/dawg appears to be upside down?

 

[dall]

the spikes look like something is wrong along with the tiny muffler along the spikes

 

[Jon1212]

the spikes look like something is wrong along with the tiny muffler along the spikes

That's the exhaust pipe along the side. It extends up, and away from the muffler. Check out an IPL, it's a really funky design.

 

[SawTroll]

One of the biggest POS saws Husky ever made.

Husky doesn't really make it, Zenoah does - but they are of course responsible anyway.

 

[SawTroll]

It looks like a T435 with a rear handle, .... .

As far as I know, that basically is what it is.

 

[SawTroll]

I take my post back. I was thinking of the 339xp based off the 338xpt. I know nothing about this one.

Those are much better saws than this one.

The 439 isn't a replacement for the 339xp, but sort of a replacement for the lesser 336.

 

[Tor R]

Well balanced, easy to flip around, antivib isnt really as bad as spec, throttle respons was okey, chain cover&clutch cover parts are more solid compared to Stihl MS 201.....and it's stop there, I've seen two of them, they dont last.

Just another failure from Husky, instead of the 439 they should had made 539XP.

 

[SawTroll]

Well balanced, easy to flip around, antivib isnt really as bad as spec, throttle respons was okey, chain cover&clutch cover parts are more solid compared to Stihl MS 201.....and it's stop there, I've seen two of them, they dont last.

Just another failure from Husky, instead of the 439 they should had made 539XP.

I assume it will come, as a rear handle version of the T540xp - or maybe they have concluded that the market for high end rear handle saws in that class isn't large enough?

 

[Tor R]

I assume it will come, as a rear handle version of the T540xp - or maybe they have concluded that the market for high end rear handle saws in that class isn't large enough?

I think all brands should have a good pro leightweight saw to offer, Stihl has been best in class for ages, Husky just doesnt seem to understand it, they gave us 543 who is a totally fiasco, they came with 439 who is far from reliable.