WTF!!!!! Now you’re making up rules?!?!?!? Scared big bro? Wishing you knew how to do that “stupid filing” now? I’ll play fair and even, but that’s some BS...lol!Speaking of that, NO SQUARE FILE CHAINS JOSH!
So in other words, he won’t hold it. That sucks
Screw that. File up 2 chains, run on both saws for 2 cuts each, then 5 cuts each. Check for deviation in chain times then test some more. Square on both will level the playing field in my opinion.
Not really. I think he knows I’m serious and honest because he said he would be willing to meet about halfway. If so it might work out tomorrow.
Square filed chain is da debil!!!
But then I’d have to convert 4 chains to square. Joe won’t even try square filing. Given that, I’d count on us both using round ground square chisel. Just easier on me.
Yes. But the 262 is the slightly bigger sibling to the 254. They are similar enough a 262 cylinder can be put on a 254. My point was that the 254 probably isn’t that far off in performance. Maybe someone whose had both can comment about that.
I haven’t run 3/8 on my 254, it seems really happy with .325. Might be worth a try though.
It’s all good Deetsy...Stihl bros welcome hereOk, I'll leave you husky fellers alone now.
Effin A!! Tree-90-Feckin-Fo!!
I don't own a 262 yet but am working on closing a deal as we speak. Having said that, my guesstimation is that the 254 and 262 relate to each other as a 346 and 357. I don't think a 346/262 comparison would be remotely competitive once the wood reaches 14" or so. I do think that the 254/346 comparison will be very interesting though.
