Dolmar 64xx/73xx/79xx series, smurfs and solo 665/675/681 thread

CLEARCUT · Jun 27, 2019

huskyboy said:
Don’t pry on it and that saw won’t give you problems. The AV isn’t as strong as the 572 or 462.

Yeah, I noticed that quickly. I will have some spare springs here soon just in case. That has been the number one complaint I have heard from anyone in my area who has tried them. Otherwise, they liked it. When I get hung up,(I’ve heard about it) I won’t treat it like a 461, lol. Had it pinched in a log yesterday, jerked on it like a Stihl for a second, then calmly used some wedges. The lightweight bar is probably a good thing for this saw, and for me.

CLEARCUT · Jun 27, 2019

huskyboy said:
Also, check out the size of the flywheel... huge compared to a 372 or other 5 cube saws. That has to help the torque greatly imo. They made it heavier I think because the piston and crank are super light. Not much reciprocating mass. If they put a light flywheel on it... it probably wouldn’t be as impressive in torque.

It does have an impressive flywheel, which I agree with you is providing some torque. I have been on the fence for this saw for awhile, but I gave in, and my 462 and 572 are home now at least for this job. They just don’t seem to have as much torque, which is mostly what I like. Could just be new saw feelings, but it really is pulling better compared to them with the 32. I don’t mind tuning a carb, so that’s not an issue, and I really don’t notice any sort of weight difference between the 7900 and the 572.

huskyboy · Jun 27, 2019

CLEARCUT said:
It does have an impressive flywheel, which I agree with you is providing some torque. I have been on the fence for this saw for awhile, but I gave in, and my 462 and 572 are home now at least for this job. They just don’t seem to have as much torque, which is mostly what I like. Could just be new saw feelings, but it really is pulling better compared to them with the 32. I don’t mind tuning a carb, so that’s not an issue, and I really don’t notice any sort of weight difference between the 7900 and the 572.

They really are impressive saws. The only draw back to them I can think of off the top of my head is the rather weak av and it is kind of a thirsty saw. But other than that, I love mine. I retired it for the summer to use the 572 but next winter I’ll use it again. It’s cut a lot of wood for me.

huskyboy · Jun 27, 2019

Oh and the bar oil cap always gets stuck on and you need a scrench to take it off lol. Can be fixed with a flippy cap off a husky or just always have that scrench on you.

CLEARCUT · Jun 27, 2019

huskyboy said:
They really are impressive saws. The only draw back to them I can think of off the top of my head is the rather weak av and it is kind of a thirsty saw. But other than that, I love mine. I retired it for the summer to use the 572 but next winter I’ll use it again. It’s cut a lot of wood for me.

I must admit that it is a little weird to be dogged into a tree to look down and see...”Makita” hahaha.
I forgot to mention that is actually has really nice stock dogs on it. I have no intention on changing them.

huskyboy · Jun 27, 2019

CLEARCUT said:
I must admit that it is a little weird to be dogged into a tree to look down and see...”Makita” hahaha.
I forgot to mention that is actually has really nice stock dogs on it. I have no intention on changing them.

I keep telling people these saws are so underrated and undersold it’s a shame really. Keep us updated how it holds up for you.

CLEARCUT · Jun 27, 2019

huskyboy said:
Oh and the bar oil cap always gets stuck on and you need a scrench to take it off lol. Can be fixed with a flippy cap off a husky or just always have that scrench on you.

I have noticed that it sticks on a fair amount. I do always have a scrench on me, so that’s not a problem, but I was thinking of trying the flippy caps like you say.

CLEARCUT · Jun 27, 2019

huskyboy said:
I keep telling people these saws are so underrated and undersold it’s a shame really. Keep us updated how it holds up for you.

I have read that a lot on here and other places, so I thought, what the heck, let’s try it.
I’ll definitely keep you guys updated on it.

RI Chevy · Jun 27, 2019

It is bigger than both the 572 and 462. So it technically should have more torque.
72cc vs. 79cc

huskyboy · Jun 27, 2019

The peak torque number is probably relatively close ballpark on all 3 but the 462 makes it higher up, the 572 in the middle midrange and the 7900 more low end torque than the other two. There all comparable in cut speed stock imo, but powerband is different is my point.

huskihl · Jun 27, 2019

CLEARCUT said:
I have noticed that it sticks on a fair amount. I do always have a scrench on me, so that’s not a problem, but I was thinking of trying the flippy caps like you say.

I'm still attempting to tighten mine less and less each time. One of these days it'll be hanging there when it runs out of fuel

CLEARCUT · Jun 27, 2019

RI Chevy said:
It is bigger than both the 572 and 462. So it technically should have more torque.
72cc vs. 79cc

Yeah, for sure. I guess it was kind of surprising, because they’re all in the same ballpark for weight and handling for me. The 462 is obviously lighter, but I have zero issues carrying this saw with the lightweight bar on it in our terrain. A 661 I can feel is more fatiguing on a guy.
And it felt more torquey to me than my 461’s, with less vibration as well.

huskyboy · Jun 27, 2019

huskihl said:
I'm still attempting to tighten mine less and less each time. One of these days it'll be hanging there when it runs out of fuel

Lol I think some kind of vaccum occurs and it sticks or idk. The gas cap... no problems. It sure can be annoying sometimes that I know.

CLEARCUT · Jun 27, 2019

huskyboy said:
The peak torque number is probably relatively close ballpark on all 3 but the 462 makes it higher up, the 572 in the middle midrange and the 7900 more low end torque than the other two. There all comparable in cut speed stock imo, but powerband is different is my point.

Agreed, the 462 I had to keep rpm’s high to stay in the powerband.

Woodpecker · Jun 27, 2019

huskihl said:
I'm still attempting to tighten mine less and less each time. One of these days it'll be hanging there when it runs out of fuel

Been there done that. Had the gooder side effect of extra waterproofing for muh boots that day.

mettee · Jun 28, 2019

huskyboy said:
Oh and the bar oil cap always gets stuck on and you need a scrench to take it off lol. Can be fixed with a flippy cap off a husky or just always have that scrench on you.

Hit it with your purse

CLEARCUT · Jun 28, 2019

I have heard of some possible oiler problems with these. Possibly that little plastic piece wearing down? It is oiling pretty good right now.

huskyboy · Jun 28, 2019

CLEARCUT said:
I have heard of some possible oiler problems with these. Possibly that little plastic piece wearing down? It is oiling pretty good right now.

Yeah that is a weakness too, they sell a rebuild kit for the oiler, the end of it screws off. Pretty easy to disassemble.

CLEARCUT · Jun 28, 2019

huskyboy said:
Yeah that is a weakness too, they sell a rebuild kit for the oiler, the end of it screws off. Pretty easy to disassemble.

I’ve got one of those coming as well. I am a parts hoarder. I have seen where people take the plastic nub off and put a little piece of wire or a screw on it. Does that work well?

HYPERSAWS · Jun 28, 2019

@CLEARCUT said he was going to do some work to it this weekend

Dolmar 64xx/73xx/79xx series, smurfs and solo 665/675/681 thread

Here For The Long Haul!

Here For The Long Haul!

Sorta a husqvarna guy...

Sorta a husqvarna guy...

Here For The Long Haul!

Sorta a husqvarna guy...

Here For The Long Haul!

Here For The Long Haul!

Mastermind Approved!

Sorta a husqvarna guy...

Muh fingers look really big

Here For The Long Haul!

Sorta a husqvarna guy...

Here For The Long Haul!

Sassy Madam

Pinnacle OPE Member

Here For The Long Haul!

Sorta a husqvarna guy...

Here For The Long Haul!

West coast cutter