Chainsaw Jim
Con Artist LLC
- Local time
- 9:05 PM
- User ID
- 836
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2016
- Messages
- 4,014
- Reaction score
- 79
- Location
- Springfield Oregon
Here's the beginning numbers with stock ports, but with the squish cut to within .050 of the plug to compensate for the taller piston crown. There is a 3mm spacer gasket also in play.
Ex- 100
Tr- 130
In- 75
I'm not trying to force this concept on the saw. I ended up with a 660 jug that someone hacked up in an attempt of building a race saw. It is no longer useable with either a stock or 288 piston and figured if I were to save it then this might be the only way. I found a way of making the lowers work together with the piston, so that might not be much concern.
Torque monster? Gutless waste of time?
I know I could just build it and find out, but I wanted to share the idea from the beginning and not just say "look what I did".
Please share your opinions, theories, or knowledge.
Ex- 100
Tr- 130
In- 75
I'm not trying to force this concept on the saw. I ended up with a 660 jug that someone hacked up in an attempt of building a race saw. It is no longer useable with either a stock or 288 piston and figured if I were to save it then this might be the only way. I found a way of making the lowers work together with the piston, so that might not be much concern.
Torque monster? Gutless waste of time?
I know I could just build it and find out, but I wanted to share the idea from the beginning and not just say "look what I did".
Please share your opinions, theories, or knowledge.