Farmchuck
Pinnacle OPE Member
Is it even on a ship yet?!What is the different parts again?
Has you container showed up yet.....
Is it even on a ship yet?!What is the different parts again?
Has you container showed up yet.....
Is it even on a ship yet?!
True dat. I wonder though if the 565/572 are going to be very close to each other mechanically like the 365/ 372 X-Torq models. If both saws have full circle cranks stuffers aint neededBut if it’s a matter of stuffers vs not, that’s a bigger differential than the 365sp vs 372. Compare the 359 and 357. 57 = mucho grande.
True.True dat. I wonder though if the 565/572 are going to be very close to each other mechanically like the 365/ 372 X-Torq models. If both saws have full circle cranks stuffers aint needed
That too, but I've read of the 357 cyl on the 359 bottom and it's just ain't got the poke.
Is it even on a ship yet?!
Make it more Stihl esque? Wouldn't that be more beneficial in a long bar set up (mill etc). I've not seen a build thread with them being removed. Interesting, but doesn't sound like what I'd want in a port job for a 50 class saw.More volume can make more torque and lower the powerband.
Thanks for sharing this info. It's nice to hear from someone with hands on experience rather keep on speculating on the "what if's" of these new saws. Looking forward to your comparison.Ok, we have some first little issues over the pond (german forum). Broken bar stud (out of the case) and a broken clutch clip after maybe 5h. But nothing to worry about in my opinion, seems like a rare material defect (or maybe owner mistake?) to me. Like i said in the 462 thread, a fresh 572xp for porting is on its way and i have the delightful option to put it against a stock 462 (later both ported)
Wider power band is always welcome in smaller saw for me.Make it more Stihl esque? Wouldn't that be more beneficial in a long bar set up (mill etc). I've not seen a build thread with them being removed. Interesting, but doesn't sound like what I'd want in a port job for a 50 class saw.
Tell us more please!!!!Ok, we have some first little issues over the pond (german forum). Broken bar stud (out of the case) and a broken clutch clip after maybe 5h. But nothing to worry about in my opinion, seems like a rare material defect (or maybe owner mistake?) to me. Like i said in the 462 thread, a fresh 572xp for porting is on its way and i have the delightful option to put it against a stock 462 (later both ported)
I've never read of that. Do tell.
True dat. I wonder though if the 565/572 are going to be very close to each other mechanically like the 365/ 372 X-Torq models. If both saws have full circle cranks stuffers aint needed
Here's another logger perspective... He can run run 8 tanks of fuel through a saw by lunch time. Every cut is a money cut... Runs 562's and gets about 300 hours on them by which time they are begging for mercy... But, the way he sees it, if he's getting 300 hours on a saw, then it's only costing him $2 an hour for that piece of equipment. (not counting the gas and oil and chains/bars).
Huskies are easier to work on!You guys are funny arguing about stihl vs husky the only reason I'm on here is to look at @how57 and @Derf Avatar! Haha in all seriousness both saws seem like a home run to a non biased saw owner like myself. The Stihl might be lighter and faster but the husqvarna more durable and able to run a longer bar. Bar length doesn't really matter in my neck of the woods there is rarely a need for over a 24 incher.